Consultants Access
LOGIN

Talent Dynamics RSS Feed Blog Category: Jan’s Corner

Jans Corner: Business as a force for greatness

It is sad and limiting to think about about business as a tool for solely making money or making shareholders rich.

How would you view a person who would dedicate their life solely to eating? For me that would be a very limited life purpose and an outright waste of potential. The same is for business. Why limit ourselves? As much as survival is important for every business, it should not confine its existence.

Just like a human being, there is so much more a ‘business being’ can accomplish, learn and contribute if it moves beyond the survival paradigm, beyond the business as usual. In his philosophy and book, Screw Business As Usual, Richard Branson asserts that businesses can be primarily a force for good, great contributors, collective organisms to solve the most pressing problems humanity faces as well as makers of positive difference to communities, locally or globally, on a daily basis.

When considering the question of what is the responsibility of any business, I see that it’s primary purpose is to add value to the market or community it serves, and enrich all the stakeholders it impacts – in the short term and long term, and to do it all by leveraging and best using their internal resources and external opportunities. In a way, as businesses are collectives of people and they exist to serve a wider group other people, they have primarily a social responsibility at any level, including the corporate, division, department or team. This allows us to redefine what we currently understand by corporate social responsibility. What if it was not not just a noble philosophy or a small department with a PR person and a lawyer located somewhere at the end of the corridor, but instead what if corporate social responsibility was a central theme for any business? The theme that allows us to focus on adding value to the people and communities we care about and impact and to do it in the most effective way, instead of focusing on making money and surviving the presumed corporate warfare.

:: How would you think and interact in your team and your business if that social responsibility lied at the centre of why your business exists?

:: What would happen to your experience, effectiveness, and contribution if you primarily focused – individually and collectively – on adding more meaningful value and creating more sustainable leverage?

:: What legacy would you leave if your business context shifted from just financial survival to a social responsibility and impact?

Businesses provide a wonderful opportunity for us to grow and make a difference together – to accomplish more, to leave behind more, and to give our talent and work more meaning. All we need to do is to upgrade what we see is their primary purpose – this may not be easy, but for sure it seems worthwhile.

Leave a comment

Jans Corner: Which Profiles makes for the best Leader?

We often get asked which of the Talent Dynamics profiles are the best leaders. On the surface the answer might seem very easy. Of course, the Supporters. Given their people focus, blaze energy, and extroverted action dynamics, Supporters are best at leading teams and organisations as they bring others together and motivate them to be their best naturally building collaboration, trust and loyalty critical for sustained high performance.

High profile Supporters, such as GE’s Jack Walsh, eBay’s Meg Whitman or Microsoft’s Steve Balmer, have shown how much they can accomplish if they put their talent at work.

This natural talent, however, doesn’t give Supporters a monopoly on leadership. Everyone can be a leader. Businesses are complex ecosystems and different talents come handy at different times and in different situations. All profiles can bring a valuable perspective and energy that can be used to build performance and increase flow depending on the teams focus, task at hand, nature and stage of business or season of the economic cycle.

Let me give you a few ideas about how to make the best use of the leadership potential of the other seven profiles (apart from the Supporter) in the team or businesses context.

Creators might not be the best people-people or data-driven analysts, but they lead best by setting the vision and a high standard to reach for. Being task focused to start things they lead others to reach their goals. They are best at the helm of new projects and initiatives, thinking out of the box and out of the ordinary. They are the best initiators and pioneers.

Stars are fast and often don’t wait for their team to catch up or bother with the details, but they will give energy and credibility to new ideas, projects, programs or strategies through the power of their personality. They can improvise while leading upfront to build and maintain excitement, momentum and buy in when it matters. They are the best promoters.

Deal Makers are true people’s people, but they are more private than a Star or Supporter, and prefer to work one-to-one. They bring people and opportunities together and lead best when they are able to be in constant conversation whilst listening closely to what is happening around them. They are the best connectors and negotiators of win-win solutions.

Traders thrive when they can build and grow a connection with their team or customers. They might be paralysed when facing a blank sheet to fill, or strategy to create, but will quickly make sense of what is going on around them. They lead best when immersed in daily action, when timing is of essence and when they have ongoing input from their environments and people to inform their decision-making. They are the best operations leaders and excel as hands-on troubleshooters.

Accumulators are excellent project managers given their analytical skills and sense of timing. They are reliable and will find the way to deliver what is needed on time. However, they have little interest in and are ill equipped to handle office politics. Accumulators lead best when a well defined task or project needs to be accomplished and when the detail and risk management are critical for success. They are the best planners, and project and risk managers.

Lords are great at finding inefficiencies because they patiently track data, analyse the detail and strive to stay in control. For this reason, Lords are best at leading through the numbers instead of through conversation and collaboration. Lords almost always value process and policy over people, and are great at providing leadership when resources and finances are tight and success requires efficiency and precision. They are the best data-driven analytics and efficiency leaders.

Mechanics constantly look for improvements and as a result they are continually challenging the status quo on the way things are done. This can be very stimulating for some, and very frustrating for others. The best way to for them to lead people is to make it easy for others to collaborate and perform indirectly, not through motivation but by perfecting the underlying processes, procedures and systems. They are the best systematisers, improvers and finishers.

If you currently experience frustration or ineffectiveness of leadership in your team or business, it might be that you are trying to put a square peg into a round hole. As businesses and demands evolve so will the need for the appropriate leadership. Chances are that you will not need to re-organise the whole team or organisation. For a start, just notice whose talent can help most with the task or challenge at hand and provide them a space to contribute it at the right occasion. Build from small opportunities, for instance, just allowing the right person to lead a meeting or spearheading a project – and then expand from there. The reward will be a more resilient and better performing team as well as increased engagement and flow of everyone in it.

1 Comment

Jans Corner: Upgrading to a 5 Star Business

Beginning of the year is a time of hope and excitement. Not just in our personal lives. Businesses and teams get inspired and energised by the year’s goals and visions too.

Yet as we may painfully discover, great visions may fall short not because we didn’t dream enough or strive enough but because accomplishing a lofty vision requires a change of our conduct, an upgrade in how we think, interact and operate on a daily basis. For a grand vision to be feasible we need to raise our standards – individually and collectively.

For an aspiring olympic athlete, high standards means a regular focused practice and meticulous approach to nutrition, regular mental training and enough time for recovery. It means having the vision in mind and translating it into productive daily habits that best support its accomplishment. It means saying no to things that may be attractive and comfortable in the moment but detrimental in the longer run.

Dan Gable, legendary U.S. wrestler and 1972 Olympic Gold Medalist, named “Sports Figure of the Century”, emphasises the importance of high standards for high achievement. He states that “I’m a big believer in starting with high standards and raising them. We make progress only when we push ourselves to the highest level. If we don’t progress, we backslide into bad habits, laziness and poor attitude.”

Pushing ourselves to highest level does not necessary mean we need to work harder. It means working smarter and more deliberately with the end in mind but feet on the ground and running – like Dan Gables indicated, not tolerating distractions, bad habits, laziness and poor attitude that limit our progress and spoil the journey towards our aspirations. Often times raising standard actually means doing less by focusing on what makes the biggest difference.

Raising our team standards need not take long, nor be complicated. For instance, agree to come to meetings on time and prepared. To bring constructive mindset and language to problems and disagreements. To listen inquisitively before advocating our own view. To threat colleagues with respect. To stop complaining and giving reasons, and take responsibility for the produced results – yours and the team’s. To plan in advance and then test and measure your progress and learn incrementally from both successes and missteps.

If you care about high performance and accomplishment of your shared vision for this year, I’d encourage you to sit down as a team and openly begin discussing where you can raise your standards to reflect your higher aspirations. Start simple. You may discover some obvious rules, routines or behaviours that might be small to make but can go a long way.

Be specific. Explore both what you can start doing to raise your standard and what you need to stop doing or stop tolerating because it constrains you or does not serve you anymore at this level of your game.

Raising the standard of how your team and your business operate is like upgrading from a three-star inn to a five-star hotel. It takes some commitment. However, soon you notice that at almost the same effort you create very different results and experience.

Leave a comment

Jans Corner: A radically better 2013

The end of the year is in business traditionally associated with both looking back and planning the next year. Normally, we approach the business plan for the next year as an extension of the previous year. If we feel pressed or optimistic, we budget in an incremental percentage increase. We feel really bold and daring when the percentage is in lower double digits.

What if we could approach next year differently this time? In a radical fashion. One that could mobilise us and awaken the latent potential in the business.

A radical approach starts with a radically different question. Rather than asking about what can we accomplish or improve next year, ask what if it was possible to double our business or team performance? Yes, to double productivity, sales, profit or whatever is the key performance indicator for you. Or whatever has been the biggest challenge in the past.

The magic that opens up from entertaining such a question should not be underestimated. An interesting phenomenon occurs when we acknowledge that something radical is possible. We begin to search, to look intensely for ways to find out, even if we don’t know how exactly in the moment. It opens a space for us to boost our collective creativity and collaboration in areas that remained unexplored before. Also old assumptions and ways of thinking and operating will surface and be up for a challenge and upgrade.

Jack Welsh, former CEO of General Electric, used to lead his executives to set two types of goals for themselves and their business units – a base goal and a stretched goal. The base goals were the minimum that had to be accomplished for the business to perform at a level, to stay competitive and profitable. Stretched goals were designed to target the bold ambitions and bring the best out people to on the way to accomplish them. One thing was obvious, if one wholeheartedly pursued the stretched goals, the accomplishment of the base goal was virtually guaranteed. So there was no pressure just the opportunity to stretch, to expand one’s capacity and discover the hidden potential. No wonder GE was growing in spectacular fashion for several decades.

You can capture the same untapped resources and creative energy whether you are part of a small or an international corporation.

Just consider the following questions as an example:

:: What if we could attract double the customers in half the time next year? Would we be willing to explore that? And plan for it?

:: What if we could spend just a third of the time in meetings while accomplishing more every single time we meet? Would you be willing to challenge how we think about and run meetings? And change the way we go about them?

:: What if we could double our profitability while working less and having more fun and fulfilment at what we do everyday? How would need to interact and approach each problem and opportunity? And what kind of work environment we need to create and sustain?

Often, what limits us most are not the realities of the outside world but the questions we don’t ask and the assumptions we don’t question – individually and collectively.

I wish you a radically better 2013, not because you should or have to, but because if you play you might as well play big. You might be surprised that it actually takes less time and effort and is far more rewarding whether you actually achieve your aspirations or not.

Leave a comment

Jans Corner: A lasting contribution or winning at all costs?

I’m a big cycling fan. Apart from an occasional bike ride I love to watch the Grand cycling tours, most notably the Tour De France – arguably the biggest and most prominent three week cycling race in the world. I have followed Le Tour, as they call it in France, for the past ten years ever since I spent some time in Paris and witnessed Lance Armstrong win it for the fourth time.

Lance Armstrong is a cycling legend having won the race seven consecutive times. He inspired millions of people – including me – by his story of overcoming a terminal illness and succeeding against all odds. He also was the one who pointed out in his books and interviews that success in cycling is less about the individual greatness and more about seamless team work. Over the years, I have drawn many useful lessons for teamwork and high performance from cycling in the Tour de France to business. Playing to ones strengths, adjusting strategy based on the terrain, optimising the teams’ energy and timing of tactical actions, are just a few of them.

However, today I’d like to point out something completely different. In the past week, Armstrong’s phenomenal success has been shockingly turned completely on its head. He and his past team members, as well as management and staff of his teams were accused of probably the greatest doping scandal in the sports history. Based on a detailed investigation of the US Anti Doping Agency (USADA), Armstrong achieved his extraordinary success and sports prominence to a great extent due to their sophisticated and systematic doping program that virtually everyone surrounding his team participated in over a period of 14 years. It seems now obvious that the performance and success have been built on a deceitful use of banned and dangerous performance enhancing substances and methods.

Basically, Armstrong created an amazing teamwork and a high-performance culture that delivered extraordinary wins consistently but that was completely violating the spirit of the sport and the agreed rules of the game.

The story is both shocking and sad and demonstrates not just that a reputation built over a lifetime can be destroyed in a moment but also that a winning at all cost attitude, that employs questionable means that justify the ends may reap short-term awards but in the long term tends only to destroy the value that it created and more. It has a devastating effect on the individuals who participate in it and on the trust in both the team and the sports as a whole.

Sadly, I see this approach sometimes applied in business situations. The same pressure to win at all cost as is used for justifying dodgy tactics and dubious means. Phrases “everyone else is doing it, so why not us” or “this is the necessary evil” come to mind. Moreover, short-term thinking drives executives to exploit the resources for quick but unsustainable performance increases and generous rewards that come with it, only to move on and have the successors to pick up and deal with the mess that happens afterwards. Many companies covertly circumvent regulations to save profitability targets only to leave employees, suppliers, communities and the environment paying multifold for these savings now and in the future.

Gandhi said that “means are results in making” and I believe that we have a unique opportunity to build our businesses and teams around values that not only respect the shared purpose of the enterprise and the agreed rules of game in the market or industry but also ensure that we play transparently and can always look straight in the eyes of those we are serving and impacting.

Lance Armstrong’s legacy that went way beyond re-writing cycling history, to making a difference to millions of cancer patients, got severely tainted if not completely destroyed over night. Let’s choose a different path. One that might be not as spectacular in its short-term triumphs but one that is sustainable in its long-term positive impact and contribution. And also one that we can be proud of even if someone discovers the secret of our success.

 

Leave a comment

Jans Corner: Team Learning and Collective Intelligence

Ever wondered why is it possible that a team of highly intelligent individuals is often behaving, well, not so intelligently?

Shouldn’t it be that intelligent and competent people naturally make intelligent and competent teams? Yes, in theory, but not necessarily in practice.

Why? Because the collective intelligence, competence and performance of the team depends not just on the quality of the individuals but also on the quality of their interactions.

The quality of the interactions will greatly depend on how well they can see, appreciate and draw out the best of the strengths and differing points of view of the other team members at the right time.

This doesn’t come necessarily easily or quickly and requires a collective learning process for the team to go thorough. Not just at the beginning of their collaboration through widely known process often referred to as – forming, norming, storming and performing – but continuously though team practice and synchronisation.

To co-create something magnificent together teams need to operate like orchestras.

We know that in an orchestra, learning and great performance come not from sameness and conformity but from diversity and harmony that comes from that diversity. The more diversity of musical instruments and the more in sync they play together, the larger the repertoire of music they can play and the more powerful and beautiful the sound.

Well, why do we in business have such a hard time to learn from performing arts, like orchestra music?

I would assert that it is because we treasure performing over practicing together. Even though they go hand in hand. Moreover, we are not used to and geared to practicing and learning together. We might be used to meetings and retreats, to debates and reports yet often without the extra benefits they may promise.

Peter Senge, worldwide expert in the area of learning organisations and the author of the seminal book the Fifth Discipline, points out that teams, not individuals, are the fundamental learning units in modern organisations. “Unless teams can learn, the organisations cannot learn,” and of course cannot perform adequately to reflect the aspirations and intelligence of their individuals.

:: What do you do, to learn together?

:: How do you think and practice together as a team? Do you learn from every experience and improve the quality of every interaction? Or do you keep repeating the same experiences, fighting the same problems and expending energy on who is right?

:: How often do you practice? What is your practice rhythm? Daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, annually?

Team performance can generate the business equivalent of beautiful music played by an exquisitely synchronised orchestra where everyone enjoys playing their part whilst appreciating the diversity they are part of.

How much we unlock our collective intelligence will, however, depend on how willing and open we are to continuously practicing and learning together.

Leave a comment

Jans Corner: Simply the Best!

London 2012 Olympic Game are over. Athletes and spectators from around the world have enjoyed these two spectacular weeks of games, competition and records.

We have seen that Usain Bolt is arguably the best sprinter in the world, and now an athletic legend. Michael Phelps is the planet’s best swimmer and by the count of gold medals the best olympic athlete in the history. American basketball team showed that they can put up a show as well as points when it mattered to claim yet another olympic gold.

It is tough to win the gold and therefore, it is adequately regarded and celebrated. It marks the reward for an arduous four-year journey and symbolises personal or team triumph. It is also a reason for great pride and celebration at the athletes’ home, wherever around the world that is.  And it is also a proof of being simply the best.

In business we like the sports metaphor – and it really comes alive during the Olympics or big tournaments. It can fuel us to be our best and motivates us during the time of uncertainty and challenge.

Yet frequently the sports metaphor brings along severe limitations and distortions when applied (or presumed) in enterprises, teams or business interactions. We can say that like a unleashed dog it can turn back to bite us.

As a result businesses obsess about winning in the market at all cost (mostly to their stakeholders and the environment), teams experience undesirable yet somehow unavoidable internal competition that wastes time and energy, and individuals give more attention to being right and defending their opinions and interests than doing their best.

The focus becomes winning and beating the competition not providing value, being of service to others and collaborating to effectively make a difference. Trapped in the competitive metaphor we are losing sight of the bigger picture which we are part of and our business’ primary purpose – to serve people and society.

:: What if, as a business, instead of seeking to be the best in the world, we sought to be the best FOR the world?

:: What if, as a team, instead of seeking to be the best in the business, we sought to be the best FOR the business?

:: What if, as individuals, instead of seeking to be the best in the team, we sought to be the best FOR the team?

You get the idea. Being best for the world is a very different context and metaphor for leading and operating in business than being a winner.

When I first heard Richard Barrett, the British social commentator on the evolution of human values in business and society, coin this phrase I saw the exciting possibilities of what we can accomplish together by seeing the big picture as well as how our experience can shift in everyday business by asking just slightly different questions.

What possibilities can you see when you try this on?

Leave a comment

Jans Corner: Steven R Covey and individuals who make a difference

In many organisations an individual can be viewed as a little easily replaceable cog in a large machine. He or she can apparently hardly make any difference and that’s how many employees relate to their jobs.

I often see enthusiastic people who have great ideas, see great possibilities, and are eager to share their insights with other in their team or organisation. Yet they get stopped by the questions that might go something like this: “Who am I to think I change anything? Can I have any significant and lasting impact? I’m just an employee or a manager, I’m not a major decision maker. I am just a name in the box on the third, fifth, n-th level of the organisational chart. Who would even listen to me?”

Indeed, the power of the individual in companies – large or small – is greatly underestimated and underutilised. Mostly by the individuals themselves. They frequently look more at what they view they cannot change by their decisions and actions rather than what they can already influence now, however small it may seem.

18 years ago, there was one person who inspired me to think differently. It was Steven R. Covey through his book 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. Instead of thinking I can’t make a difference, I realised that I cannot not make a difference – if I focus on the right people and actions, and if I take the initiative. Ever since, I have studied and applied Dr. Covey’s thinking and principles and have been amazed by the impact of proactive empowered individuals in the interconnected world of business.

A regular employee will not be able to change the organisational strategy or culture but can greatly change his or her effectiveness and the contribution he has to others around him. By understanding them and their pressures and aspirations, by knowing oneself and learning to add value to others where it counts and where it makes a difference to their effectiveness, success and experience. The difference of us stepping up and taking on this personal leadership, however small our circle of influence might be gradually yet palpably leaves a mark around us. It engages our own vision and talent in service to others and only requires the willingness to start wherever one is and a little patience along the way.

A team or department managers can step up in a similar fashion. Slowly, proactively focus on adding more or better value to other departments and making them more effective and successful. The same spirit of service and empowerment applies. It doesn’t require others to change. It only demands the willingness to adjust to contribute better and more. One can start with question like:

:: What is our value to the other departments and how can we increase it or provide it better or more effectively?

:: How can we best leverage what the others bring to the table in our work so that we are all more successful as an organisation?

Often, small things make the biggest difference.

Ultimately, organisations are a lot less like machines with moving parts and more like organisms consisting of highly interdependent living organs and cells where each one has a great responsibility to and impact on the whole.

Rather then doubting our ability to make a difference, I invite you to consider the impact you are already making and proactively, intentionally and gradually grow it. Remember, you cannot not make a difference.

Steven R. Covey passed away recently but his legacy lives and so it his inspiring message for the workplace and life. So live, love, learn and leave a legacy – and watch the difference you make in the relationships and results… at home and, yes, at work, too.

Leave a comment

Jans Corner: No size fits all motivation

In my conversations with both executives and business owners we often dialogue about the best way to motivate their employees – to get the best out of them and to sustain their performance.

I am aware of the complexity of the issue as well as the long list of theories and methods that claim to have the found the right key to motivation. An off-the-shelf solutions to this “motivation challenge” is as rare as is a one-size-fits-all pair of jeans.

Research – and common sense – shows that money while important (for survival and the feeling of a fair value exchange) is not the only and neither the major motivating factor.

In any case, when considering motivation it helps to remember that above managers, workers and dare I say consumers, we are all humans – even with our business hats on.

As humans what will motivate us and allows us to sustain performing in the right environment – both tangible and intangible. We need autonomy, acceptance, acknowledgment, belonging, variety, and security as much as suitable space and timing to work at our best. Creating and maintaining an environment that allows for these needs to be met at the workplace makes both human and business sense. This is no big news.

Many companies, including Google, General Mills, Zappos and Disney have gone the extra mile to come up with creative solutions to make coming to work and working fulfilling and fun and thus easier to innovate, more natural to collaborate and more sustainable to perform at a high standard.

Obviously different people put different weight on each of these aspects. So it makes sense to know who is in your company and in your team and what makes them tick.

In my practice apart from profiling what I found useful is to explore these 2 simple questions:

  1. When, where and with whom do you enjoy working most?
  2. How do you know you have done a really good job?

You can explore these questions with everyone in your team as well as ask the questions yourself. I found that with a bit of curiosity and respect you can get under the surface of what makes people around you tick and click – what excites and rewards them – in a short time and without a big budget. Then all you need is a little willingness to make (often minor) adjustment in where, when and how we work and interact.

And just one more thing. Motivating conditions are great but inspiring context is magical. Unlike motivation, inspiration comes from inside out and is typically liked with our human need to grow and to contribute to others.

When we create and maintain an environment where people can grow and develop and where they find opportunities to meaningfully contribute to something larger that they care about concerns about motivation will often disappear or become secondary. People will be much more occupied by questions such as “What are we really up for?” and “How can we play our best game?”.

Leave a comment

Jans Corner: Is your business a war zone or a blooming garden?

Many times when I listen to executives I certainly get the impression that there is a war raging. They speak about “beating the competition,” “taking over new markets,” or “defending market position.” What concerns me is that they say it without even thinking about it. In their minds it is not an analogy but the reality. Naturally, that makes business into a dangerous war zone.

Analogies and metaphors can be very useful to make the complex simple and relate the known to the unknown. They are by definition not inherently true, however, they by their very nature impose a powerful set of lenses – and limitations – on how we view the world, think and interact.

The war analogy may seem useful to mobilise (ups, another military term) resources and attention in the face of a great threat. However, conducting everyday business on a commercial battlefield can be an exhausting, disheartening and counterproductive experience. Who wants to be fighting for survival every day? Even medical research shows that living in the survival mode whilst providing short-term energy boost negatively impacts our long-term health and intelligence and thus paradoxically, our chances thrive into the future. And it also makes work and business life much less enjoyable and fulfilling.

The good news is that we can change our view and experience by simply changing the analogy we use.

What metaphors and analogies could we use that would empower us to connect with our greatest inspiration, tap our innate potential and foster fruitful collaboration for everyone’s benefit?

The options are limitless though I found that the best inspiration comes from nature. How would business shift if you viewed it like a beautiful garden or a delicate ecosystem where everything has its place and importance? What if you looked at your business like a living organism with its own well-being, relationships and legacy?

In this highly interrelated world we are in urgent need for new business metaphors.

So think about it. What could be the most empowering metaphor for your team, your business and your market?

You will notice that when you change the underlying metaphor, you and your team will inevitably shift how you think and interact, and your business will transform.

Metaphors are powerful and we use them all the time, so choose them wisely – they will not only influence what will be possible for you to accomplish but also determine how enjoyable, rewarding and meaningful will the journey be for you and everyone involved in your business.

1 Comment

Page 1 of 41234
© 2000-2013 Talent Dynamics. All Rights Reserved  |  Sitemap  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions  |  Web Design
Company Reg. 7366851